Occupational Therapy Services for Transition-Age Youth with Moderate to Severe Disabilities: A Scoping Review Review
Main Article Content
Keywords
adolescents, young adults, transitional services
Abstract
Purpose: This scoping review seeks to identify specific services, assessments, and interventions utilized by school-based occupational therapy (OT) practitioners working with transition-age youth with moderate to severe developmental disabilities.
Methods: A search was conducted in CINAHL, Medline, APA PsychINFO, Education Research Complete, and Academic Search Complete databases. Articles were screened for inclusion and relevant data extracted. Included articles were peer reviewed, referred to any inclusion of occupational therapy services in school-based practice, English-language, and focused on individuals 12-30 years old with moderate to severe disabilities.
Results: Twenty articles met criteria for inclusion in the review. All articles included occupational therapy services whether providing direct or indirect services. The top two intervention types used were occupation-based interventions and advocacy-based interventions. The top two assessment types used were task-based and transition-based assessments. Occupational therapists most frequently provided direct services for transition-age youth (78.2%).
Conclusions: This review provides a guide for occupational therapy practitioners to advocate for occupational therapy’s role in transition services and overcome the barriers identified: lack of understanding of occupational therapy’s role, lack of resources, lack of measurable assessments, and lack of individualized interventions. This review provides an extensive variety of assessments, interventions, and service delivery approaches available and relevant for occupational therapists working with adolescents and young adults with moderate to severe disabilities.
References
2. Abbott BL, Provident I. Changing occupational therapists’ knowledge of their role in secondary transition planning. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv, 2016; 9(4): 382-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.1227760
3. Barlow K, Gile N. Post-secondary transition services and the role of the occupational therapist. Glob J Pediatr, 2020;1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.54026/GJP/1002
4. Rosner T, Grasso A, Scott-Cole L, Villalobos A, Mulcahey MJ. Scoping review of school-to-work transition for youth with intellectual disabilities: A practice gap. Am J Occup Ther.. 2020;74, 7402205020. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.035220
5. American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed.). Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(Suppl. 2), 7412410010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
6. American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). 2019 Workforce & Salary Survey. 2020. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://library.aota.org/AOTA-Workforce-Salary-Survey-2019/1
7. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Published April 5, 2017. Accessed April 6, 2023. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/
8. Browder DM, Spooner F, Courtade GR, eds. Teaching Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities. Guildford Press; 2020.
9. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021;372(71). doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
10. Angell AM, Carroll TC, Bagatell N, Chen C, Kramer JM, Schwartz A, Tallon MB, Hammel J. Understanding self-determination as a crucial component in promoting the distinct value of occupational therapy in post-secondary transition planning. J of Occup Ther Sch & Early Interv, 2019;12(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2018.1496870
11. Berg LA, Jirikowic T, Haerling K. Navigating the hidden curriculum of higher education for postsecondary students with intellectual disabilities. Am J of Occup Ther, 2017;71(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.024703
12. Chia-Yang Chiang, Tsu-Hsin Howe. Bridge to the future: A career exploration frame of reference for students with disabilities. Open J Occup Ther.2021;9(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1724
13. Jackson J, Rankin A, Siefken S, Clark F. Options: An occupational therapy transition program for adolescents with developmental disabilities. Occup Ther Health Care, 1989; 6(2-3), 197–214.
14. Kardos MR, White BP. Evaluation options for secondary transition planning. Am J Occup Ther, 2006; 60(3), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.60.3.333
15. Kirby AV, Feldman KJC, Himle MB, Diener ML, Wright CA, Hoffman JM. Pilot Test of the Maximizing Adolescent Post-Secondary Success (MAPSS) Intervention: Supporting Parents of Autistic Youth. Am J Occup Ther, 2021;75(3), 7503180070. doi:10.5014/ajot.2021.045815
16. Kramer, J. M., Hwang, I.-T., Helfrich, C. A., Samuel, P. S., & Carrellas, A. Evaluating the social validity of project TEAM: A problem-solving intervention to teach transition age youth with developmental disabilities to resolve environmental barriers. Int J Disability, Dev & Educ, 2018;65(1), 57–75. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2017.1346237
17. Lindsay SR, Hartman L, Fellin M. A systematic review of mentorship programs to facilitate transition to post-secondary education and employment for youth and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil, 2016;38(14), 1329–1349. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1092174
18. Mankey T. Educators’ perceived role of occupational therapy in secondary transition. J OccupTher Sch, 2012;5(2), 105–113. doi:10.1080/19411243.2012.701974
19. Merz JA, Nakasuji B, Mollo KS. (2020). Occupational therapy group programming for adolescents with developmental and learning disabilities: A retrospective documentation review. Open J Occup Ther, 2020;8(3), 1–18. doi:10.15453/2168-6408.1675
20. O’Neill KV, Gutman SA. Facilitating the postsecondary transitions of youth with moderate intellectual disability: A set of guidelines for occupational therapy practice. Occup Ther Ment Health, 2021;36(2), 119–144. doi:10.1080/0164212X.2020.1725714
21. Panyo K, Lersilp S, Putthinoi S, Hsu HY. Transition service in the occupational therapy process for students with disabilities: A systematic review. J OccupTher Sch, 2021;14(3), 343–355. doi:10.1080/19411243.2020.1862727
22. Ratzon N, Schejter T, Alon E, Schreuer N. Are young adults with special needs ready for the physical work demands? Res Dev Disabil, 2011;32(1), 371–376. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.10.018
23. Rose JF, Heine DM, Gray CM. Brief or new: Interagency collaboration to support adults with developmental disabilities in college campus living. Occup Ther in Health Care, 2005;19(1–2), 165–171. doi:10.1080/J003v19n01_12
24. Trujillo C, Poach M, Carr M. Exploring the applicability of occupational therapy transition assessments for students with disabilities. WFOT Bull, 2019;75(1): 71–77. doi:10.1080/14473828.2018.1556961
25. Wynn K, Stewart D, Law M, Burke-Gaffney J, Moning T. Creating connections: A community capacity-building project with parents and youth with disabilities in transition to adulthood. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 2006;26(4): 89–103. doi:10.1300/J006v26n04_06
26. DuBois D, Renwick R, Chowdhury M, Eisen S, Cameron D. Engagement in community life: Perspectives of youths with intellectual and developmental disabilities on families’ roles. Disabil Rehabil, 2020;42(20): 2923-2934. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1576781
27. Gauthier-Boudreault C, Gallagher F, Trépanier J, Corbin F, Couture M. Factors impacting the transition to adulthood of youth with Fragile X syndrome and their families: Facilitators, obstacles and needs. Res Dev Disabil, 2020;103(1): 215-223. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103674
28. Spencer JE, Emery LJ, Schneck CM. Occupational therapy in transitioning adolescents to post-secondary activities. Am J Occup Ther, 2018;57(4): 435–441. doi.org:10.5014/ajot.57.4.435
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright, 2025 by the authors. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.