Feasibility Study on the Relationship Between Aerobic Capacity and Intrinsic Motivation Associated with Task Self-Regulation Direct Original Research

Main Article Content

Mindy Mayol
Dr. Trent E. Cayot
Dr. Nathaniel R. Eckert
Dr. Candice Burkett
Kendall Ellis
Kelsey Stamm
Emma Petersen
Sebastian Murillo
Christopher Miller
Ines Oliveira
Delaney Muldoon

Keywords

pilot study, self-determination, VO2max

Abstract

Introduction: Law enforcement officers (LEOs) face demands that require optimal task performance despite possible motivational challenges. This feasibility study’s purpose was to investigate the relationship between VO2max and four motivation-based constructs in healthy, similar-aged individuals as LEO cadets. A better understanding of the relationship between physical fitness and intrinsic motivation is imperative in the future facilitation of LEO studies regarding task self-regulation.


Methods: 16 students (nmales=9, nfemales=7; age=23±3 yr) attending a private, Midwestern university completed a graded exercise test to volitional fatigue on a stationary cycle ergometer and the Task Evaluation Questionnaire designed to measure four motivational constructs after performing a given activity: interest/enjoyment (I/E), perceived competence (PCo), perceived choice (PCh), and pressure/tension (P/T). Due to non-normally distributed data, a Spearman's rank-order correlation was performed with an alpha level of p<0.05 set for statistical significance.


Results: Findings suggested that there was a positive, strong relationship between VO2max (42.0±10.6) and I/E (34.8±6.7), which was statistically significant, rs(14)=.639, p=.008.


Conclusions: Overall, a monotonic association was found illustrating that as the I/E motivation construct increased, VO2max also tended to increase in the same relative direction at differing rates.

Abstract 152 | PDF Downloads 50

References

1. Lin P-Y, Tseng P, Liang W-M, Lin W-Y, Cheng Y-P, Kuo H-W. The mediating effect of health behaviors on the association between job strain and mental health outcome: a national survey of police officers. Sci Rep. 2015;14(1), 1–8. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60746-8.
2. Cocke CW, Orr RM. The impact of physical training programs on the fitness of tactical populations: A critical review. Aust J Strength Cond. 2015;23(1), 39–52.
3. Werner KM, Ford BQ. Self-control: An integrative framework. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023;17. Doi: 10.1111/spc3.12738.
4. Radel R, Pelletier L, Pjevac D, Cheval B. The links between self-determined motivations and behavioral automaticity in a variety of real-life behaviors. Motiv Emot. 2017;41, 443–454. Doi: 10.1007/s11031-017-9618-6.
5. Saunders B, More KR. Some habits are more work than others: Deliberate self-regulation strategy use increases with behavioral complexity, even for established habits. J Pers. 2025;93, 233–246. Doi: 10.1111/jopy.12926.
6. Leduc-Cummings I, Werner KM, Milyavskaya M, Dominick JK, Cole S. Experiencing obstacles during goal pursuit: The role of goal motivation and trait self-control. J Res Pers. 2022;99. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104231.
7. Inzlicht M, Roberts B. The fable of state self-control. Curr Opin Psychol. 2024; 58. Doi: 10.31234/osf.io/9x6a5.
8. Werner KM, Berkman, ET. Motivational dynamics of self-control. Curr Opin Psychol. 2024;8, 59. Doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101859
9. McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989;60, 48-58.
10. Ryan RM, Koestner R, Deci EL. Varied forms of persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motiv Emot. 1991;15, 185-205.
11. Callan G, Rubenstein LD, Barton T, Halterman A. Enhancing motivation by developing cyclical self-regulated learning skills. Theory Into Practice. 2021;61(3). Doi: 10.1080/00405841.2021.1932153.
12. Maillet MA, Grouzet FME. Healthy eating in daily life: the role of relative autonomous motivation when it is difficult. Motiv Emot. 2022;46, 640–657. Doi: 10.1007/s11031-022-09960-3.
13. Van Gestel LC, Adriaanse MA, De Ridder DTD. Who accepts nudges? nudge acceptability from a self-regulation perspective. PLoS ONE. 2021;16. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260531.
14. Duckworth AL, Gross JJ. Behavior change. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2020;161, 39–49. Doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.09.002.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)