Student Perception of Online Learning Experiences Associated with COVID-19
Main Article Content
Keywords
Education, Remote-Learning, Pandemic
Abstract
Introduction: The devastation of COVID-19 has profoundly disrupted the U.S. educational system. Student dissatisfaction with online learning has adversely effected enrollment and student retention. Identifying factors that contribute to student satisfaction with online learning experiences is imperative to bolstering student retention and enrollment. This study examines student opinions related to overall satisfaction of online learning experiences during the COVID-19 shift to remote learning.
Methods: A single electronic, university wide, survey was sent out to all 16,212 students enrolled at a Southern, regionally accredited university. The survey remained open for five weeks during the fall 2020 semester. A single e-mail reminder data was sent to all students with a link to the survey and the survey closing date. Descriptive, inferential and qualitative analyses were conducted.
Results: Student satisfaction with online learning experiences during COVID-19 were much lower than previously reported averages. Student satisfaction significantly differed based on sex and program type. Female students (M=1.53, SD=.500, p=.005) and students enrolled in online programs (M=1.53, SD=.500 p<.001) reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction with online learning amid the onset of COVID-19, in comparison to male students (M=1.42, SD=.495) and students enrolled in traditional (face-to-face or hybrid format) programs (M=1.46, SD=.499). Qualitative analyses found that student opinions about instructional design elements pertaining to course structure (content, sequence and methods), sociology and compassion influenced student satisfaction with online learning experiences.
Conclusions: Student sex, type of program, elements of course design, and instructor compassion influenced student satisfaction with learning experiences during the onset of COVID-19. Improvement in course structure and student-teacher interaction may improve student rates of satisfaction with online learning experiences.
References
2. Cummings, J. Six key design elements of successful online learning. Global Online Academy. https://globalonlineacademy.org/insights/articles/six-key-design-elements-of-successful-online-learning-1.2020. Accessed January 1, 2020
3. Gayton, J. Comparing faculty and student perceptions regarding factors that affect student retention in online education. Am J Distance Educ. 2015; 29(1), 56-66, DIO: 10.1080/08923647.2015.994365. Accessed January 1, 2020
4. Yang, Y. & Durrington, V. Investigation of students’ perceptions of online course quality. Int J ELearn. 2010; 9(3) 341-361.
5. Fetherson, T. Pedagogical challenges for the World Wide Web. Educ Techn Rev, 9, 1http://www.aace.org/pubs/etr/fetherston.cfm. 2001. Accessed September 23, 2020.
6. Hardy, K., & Bower, B. Instructional and work life issues for distance learning faculty. New Directions Community Coll. 2004; 128, 47–54.
7. LaMonica, L. The role of the instructor in Web-based instruction: Are we practicing what we preach? DEOSNEWS. http://www.geocities.com/llamonica/instructorwbt.html. 2001. Accessed September 25, 2020.
8. Oliver, R. Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. In L. Foster, B. L. Bower, & L.W. Watson (Eds.), ASHE Reader—Distance education: Teaching and learning in higher education Boston: Pearson Custom; 2002.
9. Gaytan, J. Factors affecting student retention in online courses: Overcoming this critical problem. Career and Tech Educ Res. 2013; 38: 145–155. Accessed January 1, 2020
10. Boling, E.C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. Internet High Educ. 2011; 15: 118-126. Accessed January 1, 2020
11. Shim, T.E. & Lee, S.Y. College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19, Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;119.
12. Appana, S. A review of benefits and limitations of line learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. Int J E-Learning. 2008; 7: 5–22. Accessed January 1, 2020
13. Stanford-Bowers, D. E. Persistence in online classes: A study of perceptions among community college stakeholders. J Online Learn Teach MERLOT. 2008. 4 (1). Available online at http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no1/ stanford-bowers0308.pdf
14. Dickey, M.D. Integrating cognitive apprenticeship methods in a web-based educational technology course for P-12 teacher education. Comput Educ. 2008; 51: 506-518. Accessed January 1, 2020.
15. Eom SB, Ashill N, Wen HJ. The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decis Sci. 2006; 4(2): 215-235.
16. Gray J, DiLoreto M. The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments. NCPEA Int J Educ Leadersh. 2016 May; 11(1).
17. Hodge, D.R., Gillespie, D. Phrase completions: An alternative to likert scales. Soc Work Res. 2003; 27: 45-51. Accessed July 1, 2018.
18. Raaijmakers, Q.A.W., van Hoof, A., Hart, H.T., Verbogt, T.F.M.A., & Vollebergh, W.A.M. Adolescents’ midpoint response on Liker-type scale items: Neutral or missing values?
Int J Public Opin Res. 2000; 12: 208-216. Accessed July 1, 2018
19. IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
20. Cole MT, Shelley DJ, Swartz LB. Online Instruction, E-Learning, and Student Satisfaction: A Three Year Study, Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn (IRRODL), 2014; 15,(6).
21. Rodriguez MC, Ooms A, Montanez M. Students’ perceptions of online-learning quality given comfort, motivation, satisfaction, and experience. J Interactive Online Learning. 2008; (7)2.
22. Morante A, DJenidi V, Clark H, West S. Gender differences in online participation: Examining a history and mathematics open foundation online course. Australian J Adult Learn. 2017 July; (57)2.
23. Venable M. Trends in online education: Gender differences. Best Colleges Survey, 2020. Retrieved from https://res.cloudinary.com/highereducation/image/upload/v1605640510/BestColleges.com/edutrends/2020-Online-Trends-in-Education_GenderDifferences_BestColleges.pdf
24. Price L. Gender differences and similarities in online courses: Challenging stereotypical views of women, J Comput Assist Learn. 2006; 22(5):349-359.
25. Besser A, Flett GL, Zeigler-Hill V. Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the Covid-19 PANDEMIC: Understanding the challenges for students. Scholarsh Teach Learn Psychol. 2020. doi:10.1037/stl0000198
26. Gopal R, Singh V, Aggarwal A. Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic perioid of COVID19. Educ Inf Technol. 2021;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
27. Davis-Kean PE. The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. J Fam Psychol. 2005; 19(2):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294.
28. Mello ZR. Racial/ethnic group and socioeconomic status variation in educational and occupational expectations from adolescence to adulthood. J App Dev Psych. 2009; 30(4): 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.029
29. Bradford, G. & Wyatt, S. (2010). Online learning and student satisfaction: Academic standing, ethnicity and their influence on facilitated learning, engagement and information fluency. Internet High Educ, 13(3):108-114.
30. Ashong CY & Commander NE. Ethnicity, gender, and perceptions of online learning in higher education. J Online Learn and Teach MERLOT . 2012; (8)2:98-110.
31. Lau EYH, Li J, Lee K. Online Learning and Parent Satisfaction during COVID-19: Child Competence in Independent Learning as a Moderator, Early Educ Dev, 2021; 32(6): 830-842, DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2021.1950451
32. Loton D, Parker PD, Stein C, Gauci S. Remote learning during COVID-19: Student satisfaction and performance. doi:10.35542/osf.io/n2ybd.
33. Dong C, Cao S, Li H. Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020; 118(105440): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440.
34. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Educ. 2000; 2(2-3): 87-105.
35. Schubert-Irastoriza C, Fabry DF. Improving Student Satisfaction with Online Faculty Performance. J Res Innov Teach. 2011 March; 4(1):168-179.
36. Baber H. 2020. Determinants of students’ perceived outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. J Educ E-Learn Res, 2020; 7(3): 285-292.
37. Moore MG. Editorial, what does research say about the learners using computer-mediated communication in distance learning? Am J Distance Educ. 2002; 16(2): 61-64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1602_1.
38. Jaggars SS, Edgecombe N, Stacey GW. (2013, April). Creating an effective online instructor presence. Report completed for the Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED542146.pdf
39. Kuo Y, Walker AE, Belland BR, Schroder KEE. A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. Int Rev Res. 2014; 14(1): 16-39.
40. O’Connor C, Joffe H. Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines Int J Qual Meth. 2020; 19: 1-13.
41. Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. 2002. Sage.
42. Campbell JL, Quincy C, Osserman J, Pederson OK. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Soc Meth Res. 2013; 42: 294-320.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright, 2025 by the authors. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.